Untangling the Web: the next six topics

Over the next two months, I’ll be untangling the effects of the World Wide Web from six more human social phenomena, documenting findings from the academic research and interviews with experts here and in the fortnightly columns in The Observer.

I’ve already looked at a whole host of topics including social change, love, hate, sex, health, family, religion, disability and Britishness - among many others. You can read the research on each of these topics by clicking on their tags at the bottom of this post.

Looking forward, I’ll be asking how digital media has - or hasn’t - transformed the experiences and functions of serendipity and discovery, education, life stages (from birth to old age), home, intellectual property and death.

Send your thoughts on these topics to aleks.krotoski.freelance@guardian.co.uk or to @aleksk, and I’ll try to include your responses on the blog and in the column.

‘Faith 2.0: Religion and the Internet’ podcasts

Audio from yesterday’s event at the RSA.

Religious identity: how should we understand the nature and activities of online faith-based communities? with Heidi Campbell (UTTW interview here)

Building New Communities: How has the internet created space for new religious communities to come together?

Sr Catherine Wybourne’s keynote (UTTW interview here)

Religious Authority and the Growth of Online Extremism

Brasher, B.E. (2001). Give me that online religion. Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick.

This is the Google Books link.

From Publisher’s Weekly:

How is cyberspace transforming American religion? Brasher, an independent religion scholar, believes that the Web’s new transcendence spells nothing short of a bona fide Reformation for religious traditions. Just as the printing press made possible the Lutheran Reformation, the explosion of cyberspace “brings with it a tidal wave of new spirituality that may sweep us all up in its path.” Brasher is a bit vague about the details of this sea change, believing that specific prognostications about the future of online religion are unwise since the technology itself changes so rapidly. She offers a few tantalizing tidbits based on a sampling of the more than one million faith-related Web sites that now exist. How about a Cyber-Seder? Or “repentance” Web pages where confessing Christians list their sins and then, with the click of a mouse, see them erased? Brasher expresses an informed ambivalence about the future of online religion, noting some of its positive points (e.g., the ability to enjoy the sacred anytime and from anywhere, and the increased potential for religious diversity) while elucidating its potential dark side. She asks whether disembodied cyberspace is genuinely capable of promoting religious community. Complementing the thoughtful text is a dramatic, Web-inspired layout that features graphics, curved pull-out quotes and hip background designs. While Brasher’s book is sometimes tentative, it bravely tackles a momentous new topic, and will be consulted by the many scholars who follow her cookie trail.

Hat tip to Paul Teusner’s article, New Thoughts on the Status of the Religious Cyborg (pdf), which he referenced in his interview for this column here.

“India’s first spiritual networking website.”

I spoke with Madhuri Khanduja, who launched the site in November 2010, when I was in Delhi in December. She has some crazy ideas about making spiritual ascension game-like, with badges:

For example Facebook wherein you can connect with your friends, listen to their updates, today you can follow people, understand what is the conversation going on.  For spiritual networking you can follow gurus, masters like Deepak Chopra, Ravi Shanka, Jaggi Vasudev, and you can come… you can understand their teachings, they’ll be answering your queries, wall updates and you’ll have badges for different levels. As you grow, as you enlighten in the spiritual world, you’ll have badges for them.

They’ve also got streaming yoga. For reals.

Wertheim, M. (1999). The Pearly Gates of Cyberspace: A History of Space from Dante to the Internet. W.W. Norton & Company.

This is the full pdf of this chapter from science writer Margaret Wertheim’s look at the almost ecclesiastical way we looked at the web in the years before the boom.

Publisher’s Weekly said:

In this serious and intriguing, if far-fetched, study, Wertheim (Pythagoras’ Trousers) argues that cyberspace gives us “a technological substitute for the Christian space of Heaven.” She explains that early Christians hoped to trade “the troubled material world” for the next one, where bodies would be perfected or disappear and “injustice and squalor” would vanish. Internet partisans make similar claims: in cyberspace everyone’s equal and nobody’s ugly. Christian theology, as espoused by medieval art and literature, imagined a place for bodies (this world) and a place for minds and souls (the next world). But modern science and modern thought (the Renaissance invention of perspective; Copernicus, Newton, Einstein) have explained and demystified physical space, leaving “no place more special than any other,” nowhere for us to imagine that souls can be. Wertheim discusses hopeful fictions of “hyperspace,” from H.G. Wells to Cubism to Star Wars, before turning (in chapter 6) to the Net, whose denizens?especially users of MUDS (multiple-user dungeons)?have, she contends, found a space for the soul online. This is, she adds, cause for both celebration and worry, since the “cyber-utopians” haven’t found a clear way to make cyberspace stand (as Heaven did) for an ethics. Wertheim is intent on explaining the Net’s meanings, not its workings. If her book belongs to one particular field, it’s the minuscule?but mushrooming?one in which literary and cultural critics consider Net phenomena. As such, it’s both provocative and worthwhile.

Read a review from Salon.com.

Hat tip to Paul Teusner’s article, New Thoughts on the Status of the Religious Cyborg (pdf), which he referenced in his interview for this column here.

Networked Individualism: or, how social media has transformed our relationships

University of Toronto sociologist Barry Wellman has been writing about online community and networked interactions for several decades, observing some of the earliest wired communities, and reporting on the social changes that have resulted.

One of the most prominent effects that he describes has been the rise of “networked individualism,” which has a potentially transformative impact on how we consume content and interact with traditional group-oriented institutions, like organised religion. He proposes that the web puts the individual at the centre of his/her community, rather than the community identity.

In this 2002 article (pdf), he describes the theoretical scaffolding for networked individualism, and how he expected the web would affect community structures. This is, of course, before the rise of social media and Web 2.0, which others have suggested makes this phenomenon even more relevant (and prevalent).

Here are my (few) notes:

“communities are far-flung, loosely-bound, sparsely-knit and fragmentary…Rather than fitting into the same group as those around them, each person has his/her own ‘personal community’.”

“The proliferation of personal community networks happened well before the development of cyberspace…”

“it has emphasized individual autonomy and agency. Each person is the operator of his;/her personal community network.”

by Gary Bunt (2009): UNC Press.

Gary Bunt’s homepage. Gary will be speaking in the afternoon session at the Faith 2.0 event on Thursday 14 April 2011 at the RSA in London.

Via @julaybib

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

Professor Heidi Campbell is an authority on religion and the web. Based in the Communications Department at Texas A&M University, her most recent book on the subject (of several) is When Religion Meets New Media (associated blog).

Here’s the blurb:

This book focuses on how different Jewish, Muslim, and Christian communities engage with new media. Rather than simply reject or accept new media, religious communities negotiate complex relationships with these technologies in light of their history and beliefs. I suggest a method for studying these processes called the “religious-social shaping of technology” and students are asked to consider four key areas: religious tradition and history; contemporary community values and priorities; negotiation and innovating technology in light of the community; communal discourses applied to justify use.  A variety of examples such as the Christian e-vangelism movement, Modern Islamic discourses about computers and the rise of the Jewish kosher cell phone, demonstrate the dominant strategies which emerge for religious media users, as well as the unique motivations that guide specific groups.

There are several papers available to the public on her website, including Who’s Got the Power? The Question of Religious Authority and the Internet (from 2007) and Spiritualising the Internet: Uncovering Discourse and Narrative of Religious Internet Usage (from 2005).

I spoke with Prof Campbell for 20 minutes via Skype about her work. Specifically, we talked about how religious institutions have adapted their practices to the web, whether the technology encourages radicalism and splinter groups, and how the faithful will practice in the future. We also discussed how social media - including networks like Facebook - promote a new kind of religious interaction, reflected by Barry Wellman’s networked individualism (pdf) (and how this may not be the case in non-Western countries).

This is the whole, unedited conversation. Expect an adapted version on Tech Weekly next week.